eSTAR Pilot program by Health Canada & US FDA

eSTAR Pilot program by Health Canada & US FDA

eSTAR (electronic Submission Template and Resource) is an initiative launched by the US Food and Drug Administration in February 2020. It is a free, interactive PDF Form that provides assistance to the applicants in preparing the CDRH medical device submission for 510(k)s and De Novos.

The content of the form is automated with an automatic verification feature, and the structure is complementary to the internal review and also harmonized with the IMDRF and guided construction for each submission section.

The US FDA has announced a pilot program in collaboration with Health Canada. The practicability of using eSTAR will be determined by the outcome of 9 participants. The pilot program has eligibility criteria as below:

  • Sponsorer must be in-process to submit an eSTAR application for the same medical device in Health Canada and US FDA within 6 months of acceptance into the pilot.
  • The submission must be for a new or significant change amendment to Class III or IV submission of Health Canada                                                        OR
  • A 510(k), De Novo or Pre-market Approval (PMA) original, 180-day, real-time or panel track supplement to FDA
  • The Sponsorer must complete the eSTAR application
  • The pilot program is NOT applicable to IVD devices, Combination products, CBER products or an FDA dual 510(k)/CLIA waiver application.

Limitations of eStar Pilot

  • Health Canada will not accept Regulatory Enrollment Process (REP) submission
  • Submissions are accepted only in English at present.

Interested device sponsors can send in their participation request at [email protected] and [email protected] with the subject line “Request for participation in eSTAR Pilot”. The participation email should cover the following points:

  • A statement asking to participate in the pilot
  • Applicant name
  • Contact name and title
  • Device trade name(s)             `
  • The FDA primary product code, Global Medical Device Nomenclature (GMDN) and Preferred Name Code (PNC) of your device
  • A statement that the same medical device using the eSTAR will be submitted within 6 months of acceptance in the eSTAR pilot to both Health Canada and the FDA:
    • For Health Canada: specify if it is a new or significant change amendment for a Class III or IV submission
    • For FDA: specify if it is a 510(k), De Novo or PMA submission (specify if the PMA submission is original, 180-day, real-time or a panel track supplement)

The FDA and Health Canada intend to revert to emails within 3 business days. The file size should be Less Than 1 GB, and images and videos to be submitted in compressed format. The fee structure is as follows:

Health Canada

US FDA

Once accepted into eSTAR pilot, FDA & Health Canada will provide the Sponsor with the following items:

  • eSTAR to prepare the submission
  • Submission process information via the internet and mail service. Sponsorer can choose which route to adopt.
Health Canada Medical Device Listing

Health Canada Medical Device Listing

Health Canada is the regulator of therapeutic products, including medical devices. Health Canada’s Medical Devices Active Licencing Listing (MDALL) contains a list of products that are already in the Canadian medical device market.

It also contains the database for products that were previously licensed. This article discusses the various information available on MDALL.

Read our article on overview of medical device registration in Canada to understand the various license requirements for different classes of medical devices.

In brief, there are two types of licenses- Medical device establishment license (MDEL) and medical device license (MDL). MDL, the latter of the two, is for medical devices that fall under the category of device class II, III and IV. Medical Device Establishment License (MDEL) is for Class I devices.

The Medical Devices Active Licensing Listing (MDALL) database has the license information of all medical device license or MDL.

The Bureau keeps track of all licenced Class II, III, and IV medical devices for sale in Canada. Class I medical devices do not require a medical device licence and are controlled through Establishment Licensing by the Health Products and Food Branch Inspectorate (Compliance and Enforcement).

There are two types of licenses searches available on MDALL:

  • Search Active Licences and
  • Search Archived Licences

Search Active license opens the Medical Devices Active Licence Search window. In the Search Active Licence window, only products that are currently licenced for sale in Canada will be displayed.

Health Canada Database Details

This window allows you to search the database using one of six parameters:

  • Company Name,
  • Licence Name,
  • Device Name
  • Company ID
  • Licence Number and
  • Device Identifier

Search Archived license opens the Medical Devices Archive Licence Search box. This section of the system contains data on all items ever licenced by the Medical Devices Bureau, with the query result color-coded.

Obsolete products are displayed in red, while currently, active products are in black. This window provides only three search parameters, which are as follows

  • Licence number
  • Device name and
  • Device identifier

Health Canada cautions users to not import or purchase medical devices that are not permitted for sale in Canada.

FAQs

What is the use of a medical device license database?

A database of medical devices or license helps the end user understand the quality of a product. It also ensures that the device that is in use is easily traced to it manufacturer. Countries like US and Canada have a well-established device database for transparency. Countries that do not have this may have the devices documented but the information may not be accessible to public.


Disclaimer: Regulations/legislations are subjected to changes from time to time and the author claims no responsibility for the accuracy of information.

Global ISO Requirements

Global ISO Requirements

What is ISO?

ISO – International Organization for Standardization, is the international, non-governmental body for drafting and establishing technical and non-technical standards.

These standards are developed by different committees within the International Organization for Standardization. Having around 165 member states, with one representative from each, International Organization for Standardization is a global entity catering to the needs of industry requirements.

Are ISO standards important?

The International Organization for Standardization medical device standards are the Bible for many countries, especially ones which do not have predefined regulations or processes.

For regulated countries, in addition to their respective regulations and guidance, ISO standards are also preferred. The most popularly referred ISO standard is the ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes.

In addition to general standards, ISO also publishes product-specific guidance such as for Implants, Orthopedic, Medical Electric Equipment, and many more.

Global International Organization for Standardization Requirements

In Europe, the European Commission has the Medical Device Regulation MDR 2017/745 and In-vitro Diagnostic Device Regulation IVDR 2017/746.

These regulations provide a detailed framework for introducing a medical device in the European market. However, in addition to that, certain International Organization for Standardization may also be referred to for ensuring a better-quality product.

Some of the many popularly used standards include:

  • ISO 14971:2019 Medical Devices – Application of Risk Management to medical devices
  • ISO 15223-1:2021 Medical devices – Symbols to be used with information to be supplied by the manufacturer – Part 1: General requirements
  • IEC 60601-2-83 Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-83: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of home light therapy equipment
  • IEC 60601-1 Medical electrical equipment – Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance

The European Commission also has Harmonized Standards, developed by European Standards Organization CEN, CENELEC, or ETSI, per the international standards.

It provides a list of the applicable harmonized standards for enhanced product safety and quality.

In the USA, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Guidance.

  • CFRs are legally binding. Manufacturers must comply with the requirements of CFR
  • The guidance provides Agency’s thinking on regulatory issues. They are NOT legally binding

In addition to these, the FDA also accepts certain recognized consensus standards from different organizations such as International Organization for Standardization, CLSI, ANSI, IEC, CEN, etc.

These standards may be used to justify a Declaration of Conformity for a product. The widely accepted medical device International Organization for Standardization are, but are not limited to:

  • ISO 10993 – Biological Evaluation for Medical Devices
  • ISO 14160 – Sterilization of Healthcare Products
  • ISO 11737 – Sterilization of Medical Devices

In Canada, the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) is the International Organization for Standardization member body. Similar to the US FDA, the Therapeutic Products Directorate (TPD) of Health Canada periodically releases a list of acceptable international or national standards for medical devices.

Manufacturers can use these recognized standards in conjunction with the Health Canada’s Medical Devices Regulations (SOR-98/282) and the Guidance Documents, to prove product conformity and safe use in the market.

China‘s National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) is developing indigenous standards that more closely align with those of ISO. Biocompatibility testing is one avenue where the scope and requirements for China are more than that of the US/EU.

Hence, NMPA has developed various biocompatibility testing standards which are to be used in addition to the International Organization for Standardization standard.

For the rest of the world’s medical device industry,

  • India encourages International Organization for Standardization certification for all its industries. The medical sector must be International Organization for Standardization 13485 compliant while the pharmaceutical sector must be ISO 9001 compliant for Quality Management Systems, in addition to other relevant and applicable International Organization for Standardization.
  • Japan’s The Japanese Industrial Standards Committee (JISC) is an International Organization for Standardization member body. The regulatory authority, Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Agency (PMDA) revised its Ordinance No. 169 in 2021 to closely align with the International Organization for Standardization 13485:2016 standard. The transition period is 3 years and must comply by March 25, 2024
  • For the Korean regulatory authority, aligning the requirements of Korean Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) to that of International Organization for Standardization 13485:2016 is believed to be a step closer to entering the Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)
  • Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare (Roszdravnadzor) is known to accept International Organization for Standardization 13485:2016 certification. Information on acceptance of other International Organization for Standardization cannot be confirmed. It does not accept market approvals in the US, EU, or other countries as a reference for market authorization in Russia
  • Australia’s Standard Australia is a member of the International Organization for Standardization, IEC, and ICSID. It strongly encourages the use of international standards, except where their use is ineffective or inappropriate and does not develop any national Australian standard for which there is already an international standard in existence. In 2019, TGA published Therapeutic Goods (Conformity Assessment Standard for Quality Management Systems) Order 2019 which provides a list of applicable conformity assessment standards.
  • Brazil’s ANVISA accepts Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) along with the International Organization for Standardization 13485

FAQs

Can QMS be established solely based on ISO standards?

For countries that do not have their own QMS regulations, the ISO standard can be used as a reference. For countries with established local regulations, and that accepts ISO, both ISO standard and local/national regulations must be considered.

Are ISO standards freely available?

No. ISO standards are available for purchase from the ISO official website. However, they do have FREE read-only formats available.

Comparing ISO standards to local regulations, which one takes precedence?

The local or national regulation always takes precedence over the ISO standard.

Can the manufacturer use an older version of an ISO standard for compliance?

No. Manufacturers must make sure they comply with the active or most recent version of the ISO standard. This is not restricted just to ISO standards but applies to National regulations too. Manufacturers must keep their QMS up to date with the latest requirements of the industry. The ideal way to be updated is to refer to the latest version of any Standard or Regulation.


Disclaimer: Regulations/legislations are subjected to changes from time to time and the author claims no responsibility for the accuracy of information.